Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 1 year a go today, Concord was released.
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

1 year a go today, Concord was released.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
games
53 Posts 34 Posters 9 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kugmo@sh.itjust.worksK kugmo@sh.itjust.works
    This post did not contain any content.
    🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 K This user is from outside of this forum
    🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 K This user is from outside of this forum
    🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮
    wrote last edited by
    #36
    Never forget. Cuz that shit was funny AF.
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C criss_cross@lemmy.world
      I don't think you're trying to engage honestly but I'm going to on the off chance someone is reading this thread on a bad day and thinking "maybe he has a point? Why can't I be attracted to XYZ?" You're trying to twist this into a question of "do I have to be attracted to everyone in order to be accepting"? The original question that's being engaged with is why, in your words, does - "morbidly obese" - "gender non-conforming" Make for "the worst character designs in living memory"? Why can't gender non-conforming characters have an interesting character design? Why is physical fitness required for an interesting character design? The subtext I'm reading from this is *you* think that in order for a character to have an interesting design that they must be attractive. If that's not what you're trying to say feel free to claim otherwise, but I don't know why else you'd bring those factors in if you weren't... A counter argument to your claim: I claim deep rock galactic has very interesting character designs. The costumes all have a similar theme but are distinct enough I can tell the difference between the characters. The colors are both grimy to indicate being underground for long periods of time but also each has a bright color palette so you can easily distinguish between characters. I think these designs are great. I am not attracted to any of these characters. I would never want to fuck any of them. I still think their designs are great. I don't think attractiveness is a requirement for interesting character design. ![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47f084a-bcf3-4b07-b42c-8f209d6495cb.png)
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      cancermancer@sh.itjust.works
      wrote last edited by
      #37
      I get your point about sexual attraction not being necessary, but you're still kind of making the other user's point for them. Deep Rock Galactic works because of a cohesive aesthetic with characters that actually fit the world they're in. Concord was like a cast of GI Joe characters who went through a corporate intersectional diversity blender.
      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • kugmo@sh.itjust.worksK kugmo@sh.itjust.works
        This post did not contain any content.
        starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
        starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
        starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        wrote last edited by
        #38
        See you in a few days for the anniversary of its shutdown
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C cancermancer@sh.itjust.works
          I get your point about sexual attraction not being necessary, but you're still kind of making the other user's point for them. Deep Rock Galactic works because of a cohesive aesthetic with characters that actually fit the world they're in. Concord was like a cast of GI Joe characters who went through a corporate intersectional diversity blender.
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          criss_cross@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #39
          I mean I wasn’t really arguing that Concord had good character designs. Just that a chunk of his criteria (obesity and gender conformity) aren’t good criteria of it.
          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ? Guest
            I called them unattractive. *You* called that a flaw. Maybe it is. Like it or not, people prefer attractive characters in PvP hero shooters. ![See the outrageous success of Marvel Rivals which launched just three months after Concord.](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/7ee586ee-6110-49cd-8a23-14d21c610a78.jpeg) You seem to be taking this very personally. If you’re more attracted to fat, lumpy, and sexually ambiguous people, more power to you. You just don’t represent the vast majority of people who play these games.
            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #40
            Where are all the fuckable men?
            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C criss_cross@lemmy.world
              Yeah I’m with you like this take always gets weirder to me. I’m a straight man. I love hot girls (or if you want me to get pedantic girls that I find attractive) I don’t have a requirement that I must want to fuck a majority of the women presented in each video game. It’s also okay for people that aren’t like me to be in video games. Even for, gasp, the entirety of the cast to be people not like me. It’s the one thing with those conservative media grift circles that gets me. If they truly had their way and every piece of media conformed to their “standards” it would be an absolutely boring fucking world where all media would just be sterile versions of the same turds pumped out. There’s be no new perspectives. No differing thoughts or challenging themes. Concord sucked and had a lot of problems. The characters not being conventionally attractive and “gender non-conforming” weren’t problems.
              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Guest
              wrote last edited by
              #41
              > The characters not being conventionally attractive and “gender non-conforming” weren’t problems. Just take Overwatch as an example. People aren't exactly ranting about how Winston (a Gorilla) isn't sexually attractive, and therefore represents the moral downfall of society and that. He's just there.
              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? Guest
                > None of the characters were attractive. One was morbidly obese. Almost all of them were gender non-conforming Some real capital **G**-amer takes here. Come everyone, let's join hands and "objectively" agree to hate minority bodies.
                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Guest
                wrote last edited by
                #42
                If you make all your characters these "minority bodies" that are unappelaing to the wider audience, then your shit is going to flop
                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • ? Guest
                  Where are all the fuckable men?
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  MolochAlter
                  wrote last edited by
                  #43
                  Baldur's Gate got them all, sorry.
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • C criss_cross@lemmy.world
                    I mean I wasn’t really arguing that Concord had good character designs. Just that a chunk of his criteria (obesity and gender conformity) aren’t good criteria of it.
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    MolochAlter
                    wrote last edited by
                    #44
                    There's something deeply funny to me that the same political side that demands representation for everyone in everything is then stunned to know that if EVERY character *doesn't* represent something the typical audience likes/wants to see that audience will go elsewhere. This is not rocket science, and it's such a deeply american problem it's honestly hilarious and frustrating at the same time with your culture's obsession with moralizing media consumption and production only somehow ever registering one way. If your game's characters look lame, uninteresting, and nothing like most people would want to *be,* nobody's gonna buy it. It's that simple. Progressives keep banging on about how people need to be represented to want to partake in a piece of media,\* then when a piece of media that represents exclusively stereotypical members of a portland polycule shows up and people are surprised if it's played exclusively by *some* polyamorous portlanders (not even all of them if you look at the stats). \* which is yet more horseshit america-centrism, the rest of the world is used to not being represented in most media we see since americans make most of it, and i'd rather laminate my own testicles than subject myself at an earnest attempt from an american at representing *my* demo. --- Furthermore: Overwatch is *super* diverse, but all their characters (yes, even the fucking gorilla, Winston is handsome as fuck *and* he passes the harkness test) look *appealing.* Their bodies look well proportioned, even Roadhog who is a morbidly obese alcoholic with visible cirrhosis looks more visually appealing than *any* concord character, because even he looks like an idealised and larger than life (pun very intended) version of a morbidly obese alcoholic. Meanwhile concord characters look like frumpy cosplayers that wouldn't qualify for 3rd place at a backwater anime con somewhere in whatever US state has the worst inbreeding rates. Your example with DRG is very fitting as well because I don't think *most* people would call those characters sexually attractive (but trust me, *some* absolutely do), but they are extremely visually *appealing.* Bold recognizable shapes that fit their roles, good color combinations, fun presentations. Concord looks like it's about to scold you for microaggressing someone, DRG looks like it's about to attempt to burp another country's national anthem it hasn't even heard before. DRG oozes goliardic fun, while Concord looks and feels like the used dishrag at the bar where that team's art director will end up working if there is any justice in the world,
                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • ? Guest
                      You call the space saturated with sameness then rip on the game for taking a different stylistic choice. You're contradicting your own arguments.
                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      MolochAlter
                      wrote last edited by
                      #45
                      You absolutely can. Something bad and uninteresting is not an *improvement* on something mediocre and uninteresting. You don't get points for the jump if you shatter both your knees on the landing and the kneecaps fly out into the stands killing one of the hotdog vendors.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? Guest
                        The uno reverse card you're trying to play is so silly. Yes, I am intolerant of intolerance. This sort of queerphobic bigotry is hateful, cringe and diametrically opposed to "_acceptance_". You can't be supportive of queer lives when you are also demonizing queer repsentation as ugly.
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        MolochAlter
                        wrote last edited by
                        #46
                        > demonizing queer repsentation as ugly. They're not, they're specifically saying Concord's character design is ugly for a lot of very practical and valid reasons, and *also* it's only representing a very specific minority of people who are a spit in the bucket of the total audience numbers necessary to support a *paid* live service title. So it's both doing a disservice to itself by just being incompetently made AND playing into the stereotype that minority rep always ends up ugly (an already very common sentiment due to how often cases of it sucking are spotlit) because it has basically nothing but that. Ironically had Concord had a more *actually diverse* cast, and not overwhelmingly represented a handful of pet groups the designers seemed to overwhelmingly favour, it would have not been possible to attack it as "they're all lame fat and/or gay." It still would have tanked, so on balance not much of an issue, but still.
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ? Guest
                          > The characters not being conventionally attractive and “gender non-conforming” weren’t problems. Just take Overwatch as an example. People aren't exactly ranting about how Winston (a Gorilla) isn't sexually attractive, and therefore represents the moral downfall of society and that. He's just there.
                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                          M This user is from outside of this forum
                          MolochAlter
                          wrote last edited by
                          #47
                          > People aren’t exactly ranting about how Winston (a Gorilla) isn’t sexually attractive Well that's for 2 reasons: 1. He's a single character, the vast majority of characters in any successful piece of media are at least somewhat appealing, and this stands true for OW. 2. Winston is a stud
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                            There's probably an angle where that pose looks dynamic. It's not this one.
                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Guest
                            wrote last edited by
                            #48
                            I really love goofy and weird characters. I have no idea how they managed to look everyone off
                            M 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ? Guest
                              And people still buy it from auctions
                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote last edited by
                              #49
                              People buy McDonald's menus for pokemon cards and throw the food away. People also buy Pokémon cards.
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M MolochAlter
                                There's something deeply funny to me that the same political side that demands representation for everyone in everything is then stunned to know that if EVERY character *doesn't* represent something the typical audience likes/wants to see that audience will go elsewhere. This is not rocket science, and it's such a deeply american problem it's honestly hilarious and frustrating at the same time with your culture's obsession with moralizing media consumption and production only somehow ever registering one way. If your game's characters look lame, uninteresting, and nothing like most people would want to *be,* nobody's gonna buy it. It's that simple. Progressives keep banging on about how people need to be represented to want to partake in a piece of media,\* then when a piece of media that represents exclusively stereotypical members of a portland polycule shows up and people are surprised if it's played exclusively by *some* polyamorous portlanders (not even all of them if you look at the stats). \* which is yet more horseshit america-centrism, the rest of the world is used to not being represented in most media we see since americans make most of it, and i'd rather laminate my own testicles than subject myself at an earnest attempt from an american at representing *my* demo. --- Furthermore: Overwatch is *super* diverse, but all their characters (yes, even the fucking gorilla, Winston is handsome as fuck *and* he passes the harkness test) look *appealing.* Their bodies look well proportioned, even Roadhog who is a morbidly obese alcoholic with visible cirrhosis looks more visually appealing than *any* concord character, because even he looks like an idealised and larger than life (pun very intended) version of a morbidly obese alcoholic. Meanwhile concord characters look like frumpy cosplayers that wouldn't qualify for 3rd place at a backwater anime con somewhere in whatever US state has the worst inbreeding rates. Your example with DRG is very fitting as well because I don't think *most* people would call those characters sexually attractive (but trust me, *some* absolutely do), but they are extremely visually *appealing.* Bold recognizable shapes that fit their roles, good color combinations, fun presentations. Concord looks like it's about to scold you for microaggressing someone, DRG looks like it's about to attempt to burp another country's national anthem it hasn't even heard before. DRG oozes goliardic fun, while Concord looks and feels like the used dishrag at the bar where that team's art director will end up working if there is any justice in the world,
                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                                wrote last edited by
                                #50
                                Exactly! In games like these, there's slowl absolutely room for minority or less "appealing" character design. Give them interesting abilities that match their character design and they'll see play. But you should also have some conventionally "appealing" characters because it turns out people like to role play as someone more attractive than they see themselves IRL. Provide a good mix so people can role play however they want, and keep things balanced such that some of the minority characters see play by the min/maxers.
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ? Guest
                                  The uno reverse card you're trying to play is so silly. Yes, I am intolerant of intolerance. This sort of queerphobic bigotry is hateful, cringe and diametrically opposed to "_acceptance_". You can't be supportive of queer lives when you are also demonizing queer repsentation as ugly.
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #51
                                  There's absolutely room for interesting LGBTQ and minority characters in a mainstream game. For example: - femboy who happens to be really good at sniping or shanking people - obese person as your tank or support - trans (either way) as a ninja or shape shifter (maybe a little on the nose?) And so on. Make them interesting to play as, and *also* include some "traditional" characters (hot, scantily clad women, muscular men, etc). Each character should be interesting, visually distinct, competitive to play with, and not too stereotypical. Games should be fun first and foremost, then interesting, etc. Including minorities is a pretty distant nice to have, so if you're going to do it, make them fun and interesting to play with.
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  • ? Guest
                                    I really love goofy and weird characters. I have no idea how they managed to look everyone off
                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #52
                                    Right? Overwatch has the fat dwarf engineer, the chubby ice girl, the scrungly paraplegic pyromaniac, six distinct lesbians, and a gorilla. Wild variety of costume design and body type. It is almost impressive how every single character in Concord is... askew. They look like cheap cosplays of themselves.
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • kugmo@sh.itjust.worksK kugmo@sh.itjust.works
                                      This post did not contain any content.
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      steeznson@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #53
                                      Just in time for Sony to release another Overwatch-like destined for the scrap heap
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0

                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • 1
                                      • 2
                                      • 3
                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups