"Jeffrey Epstein, the guy who never dies"
-
Is the NYT that much better than "reason" as of late
Anyways this is fascinating! I'm going to get up in everyone's business!
@futurebird there's good reporters at both NYT and reason. tbh reason might have a much higher % of actually good investigative reporters because a) they are operating outside of the circle jerk that is the conversations mainstream media people have with each other and b) they're libertarian politics mean they like digging up dirt.
-
@futurebird there's good reporters at both NYT and reason. tbh reason might have a much higher % of actually good investigative reporters because a) they are operating outside of the circle jerk that is the conversations mainstream media people have with each other and b) they're libertarian politics mean they like digging up dirt.
Yeah maybe but every now and then they let Charles Murray show up and write... anything.
-
@futurebird there's good reporters at both NYT and reason. tbh reason might have a much higher % of actually good investigative reporters because a) they are operating outside of the circle jerk that is the conversations mainstream media people have with each other and b) they're libertarian politics mean they like digging up dirt.
Hilariously I had a subscription to "Reason" when I was in HS because this odd libertarian was always showing up at our school and giving us Atlas Shrugged and weird political pamphlets.
I remember reading one day and thinking "This 'Atheist Magazine' is Messed up." I was like 16
(He told me it was a cool Atheist Magazine and so I would read it to annoy my mom. )
-
Hilariously I had a subscription to "Reason" when I was in HS because this odd libertarian was always showing up at our school and giving us Atlas Shrugged and weird political pamphlets.
I remember reading one day and thinking "This 'Atheist Magazine' is Messed up." I was like 16
(He told me it was a cool Atheist Magazine and so I would read it to annoy my mom. )
-
Hilariously I had a subscription to "Reason" when I was in HS because this odd libertarian was always showing up at our school and giving us Atlas Shrugged and weird political pamphlets.
I remember reading one day and thinking "This 'Atheist Magazine' is Messed up." I was like 16
(He told me it was a cool Atheist Magazine and so I would read it to annoy my mom. )
Found the creepy weirdo.
-
Found the creepy weirdo.
If I ever see the principal from back then I'm going to ask why he let that guy hang around. It was bizarre.
-
Is the NYT that much better than "reason" as of late
Anyways this is fascinating! I'm going to get up in everyone's business!
Disclaimer
This dataset was released in the buildup to, in the midst of, or in the aftermath of a cyberwar or hybrid war. Therefore, there is an increased chance of malware, ulterior motives and altered or implanted data, or false flags/fake personas. As a result, we encourage readers, researchers and journalists to take additional care with the data.
-
@futurebird @cryptadamist did you quoted “The Fountainhead” to her?!
-
@futurebird @cryptadamist did you quoted “The Fountainhead” to her?!
I was a brat not a monster.
-
There's Peter Thiel in this. Seems like in 2014 Epstein was close enough to Peter that people looked to Epstein to get set up for a Thiel playdate.
What a hack. How is the opsec of these people so terrible?
(I apologize for it being reason magazine.)
so much pimping... good lordt
OMG a bunch of the emails are about their investments in surveillance companies. Wow. Having all your emails leaked makes me think that all that data will be *so* safe and not passed around the dark web and pastebins till then end of time.
Not only does Peter Thiel want to scan your face and keep track of where you go, but he'll probably let that get hacked and used by ... anyone. Or sold to the highest bidder.
Wicked and incompetent.
-
Disclaimer
This dataset was released in the buildup to, in the midst of, or in the aftermath of a cyberwar or hybrid war. Therefore, there is an increased chance of malware, ulterior motives and altered or implanted data, or false flags/fake personas. As a result, we encourage readers, researchers and journalists to take additional care with the data.
You should also add a warning about how they are creepy and how they will depress you.
