A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater is an embarrassment for an 80-euro game
-
Well, Steam reviews has it as Very Positive (81%) atm. That's not so bad, even at that price point. After reading this, I expected reviews to be much lower.I'm not buying it strictly because I can't support Konami firing Kojima from their team and then trying to parade the corpse of his projects around to get more free money. It stinks of the same bullshit that Disco Elysium does where no matter how good the game is, it is an objectively moral choice to pirate it instead of paying the publishers for it.
-
FYI: Konami has not delisted [Metal Gear Solid: Master Collection Vol.1](https://store.steampowered.com/sub/886315/) which contains the first three MGS games. Regular price is lower than Delta's and currently even 25% off on Fanatical: https://www.fanatical.com/en/game/metal-gear-solid-master-collection-vol-1
-
I picked it up yesterday, and have only played a few hours, but it's pretty fucking cool so far imo. I never played the original though, only MGS 1 and 2.
-
Why the article only speaks about the game graphics? I mean 80 dollars is a shame, and not even for 1 dollar I would ever pay any money to Konami after what they did with Kojima. But the article doesn't say me nothing about the game itself.It's a very faithful remake of MGS3. You can play with classic controls or modern controls. If you play with the classic controls, it's basically the same game, plus a few new collectibles. The new controls come with a modern camera system and some balance changes to accommodate the increased player freedom (the tranq gun has bullet drop in this mode, for example). You can change between control modes during the game, but doing so will reload your last checkpoint. So it's good, because MGS3 was good, but it's not $80 good. And like the article says, at $80 for what is mostly a graphical upgrade you would expect to get all the bells and whistles... but some of them are conspicuously missing.
-
Why the article only speaks about the game graphics? I mean 80 dollars is a shame, and not even for 1 dollar I would ever pay any money to Konami after what they did with Kojima. But the article doesn't say me nothing about the game itself.
-
Why the article only speaks about the game graphics? I mean 80 dollars is a shame, and not even for 1 dollar I would ever pay any money to Konami after what they did with Kojima. But the article doesn't say me nothing about the game itself.