A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
Wings
-
I thought about that, but I don't think that makes sense in this situation. The wings and arms must use different muscle groups, and the biceps would be used for the arms, not the wings. Furthermore, since the wings are on the back of Pit, the muscles would either have to wrap around the rib cage or go through them, constricting the lungs.I’m not sure what your comments about the arms have to do with anything. Your sternum is on your chest, wings on your back, I’m not understanding why you’re talking about arms. In regards to muscles having to wrap around the rib cage, that’s exactly how birds wing muscles work.  
-
I used to own birds growing up, and I've felt the obvious drag of feathers on fabric. Forgive me for not letting go of the vivid memory I have.
-
Again, fictional character from a fictional race. Feel like comparing them to birds is just weirdly pedantic. You're not the only one here doing it. I just legitimately don't get itWhat are you on about? The archetypal angel wings are distinctly made of adult bird feathers, so it's natural to assume that these are too without indication of it being otherwise. Or what, are generic centaur bottom halves not meant to be hairy even though they're archetypically based on horses? Of course I would expect distinctly coarse hair if I were to touch them because I have touched horses before. And what's more, out of context, this graphic makes no special case of commenting on a character specifically but rather its main point is about the logistics of putting on and taking off a wife beater with a pair of wings attached to your back. And somehow you're griping about people following the logic in the comments? If you're so dead-set about it being about the specific character, then why did you cut out the context in the first place? Or what, am I supposed to be familiar with every single winged character out there that ever existed to know their particular details about their wins? I'm clearly going off on derivative works of the most generic ancient Greek mythology that was based on real life animals. Weirdly pedantic my ass.
-
What are you on about? The archetypal angel wings are distinctly made of adult bird feathers, so it's natural to assume that these are too without indication of it being otherwise. Or what, are generic centaur bottom halves not meant to be hairy even though they're archetypically based on horses? Of course I would expect distinctly coarse hair if I were to touch them because I have touched horses before. And what's more, out of context, this graphic makes no special case of commenting on a character specifically but rather its main point is about the logistics of putting on and taking off a wife beater with a pair of wings attached to your back. And somehow you're griping about people following the logic in the comments? If you're so dead-set about it being about the specific character, then why did you cut out the context in the first place? Or what, am I supposed to be familiar with every single winged character out there that ever existed to know their particular details about their wins? I'm clearly going off on derivative works of the most generic ancient Greek mythology that was based on real life animals. Weirdly pedantic my ass.
-
I wonder if gifs work here 
-
>I wasn't being antagonistic Then don't call people weirdly pedantic when they've explained it was based on personal experience? How else do you expect me to respond to that? Lol> Then don’t call people weirdly pedantic when they’ve explained it was based on personal experience? I didn't. I said that applying the logic of birds to a non-existent magical creature with wings not based off of a bird is pedantic. I never said you were. You're just looking for a fight. I'm blocking you and getting this over with.
-
> Then don’t call people weirdly pedantic when they’ve explained it was based on personal experience? I didn't. I said that applying the logic of birds to a non-existent magical creature with wings not based off of a bird is pedantic. I never said you were. You're just looking for a fight. I'm blocking you and getting this over with.My point is, why call people pedantic when that's clearly not the case? Do you need a dictionary? Nobody was looking for a fight, but you clearly missed the point and pressed on. Now you're vilifying people for explaining their thought process like a perpetual victim. But thank you for blocking. Honestly, I don't need to read your stupid comments or your posts in the first place.
-
Original:  [Source](https://www.tumblr.com/jelloapocalypse/178127142087/slytherin-assassin-lattemonstr-aishishiii) (Tumblr), [alternate frontend](https://priviblur.canine.tools/jelloapocalypse/178127142087/slytherin-assassin-lattemonstr-aishishiii).
