Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Exciting News: Digital Foundry Is Now Fully Independent
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Exciting News: Digital Foundry Is Now Fully Independent

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
18 Posts 10 Posters 37 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Guest
    But do we reeeeeaally trust them? Don't get me wrong, I like them for their analysis games, but I just really don't like when they put up opinion pieces about games, like I still remember that comment about Stellar Blade being a gooner game. Maybe if they tried it, they'd have seen more than just the surface level stuff in the game. Not to mention the Cynerpunk review that they took down saying that the game ran fine at 1080p (unstable)30fps, as if the standard wasn't already 60fps at the time, not to mention that they tried to gaslight people into saying the game wasn't as buggy as people were claiming. I don't watch their videos because of stuff like that. But good for them going independant, that's always good when you can safely support yourself financially.
    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Guest
    wrote last edited by
    #8
    > like I still remember that comment about Stellar Blade being a gooner game. No lies detected. Glad to see they’re still providing accurate analysis.
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ? Guest
      This post did not contain any content.
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
      wrote last edited by
      #9
      I stopped trusting them when they flooded the conversation with Nvidia price hike apologia since the Ada line’s (rtx 2000) release. They seem to have gone easy on the evangelization most recently, but they will still absolutely not do the bare minimum of calling out how insane it is for a company to engage straight-up false advertising in their official performance metrics. I liked their “optimized settings” series, but that series ended (AFAIK)
      ? die4ever@retrolemmy.comD ? 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest
        But do we reeeeeaally trust them? Don't get me wrong, I like them for their analysis games, but I just really don't like when they put up opinion pieces about games, like I still remember that comment about Stellar Blade being a gooner game. Maybe if they tried it, they'd have seen more than just the surface level stuff in the game. Not to mention the Cynerpunk review that they took down saying that the game ran fine at 1080p (unstable)30fps, as if the standard wasn't already 60fps at the time, not to mention that they tried to gaslight people into saying the game wasn't as buggy as people were claiming. I don't watch their videos because of stuff like that. But good for them going independant, that's always good when you can safely support yourself financially.
        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #10
        Honestly, I mostly trust them. I did feel they went too easy on some corpos, especially nvidia with series 50, but also amd and iirc they barely said anything about the Intel gen13/14 issues. Their attitude towards lower-end hardware is also a bit annoying, especially alex's. However they do have great retro reviews for both tech and games, and john's fascination with older tech is infectious. And I love that they have a positive attitude towards linux gaming and privacy in general, unlike many other channels.
        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Guest
          Current gen is a big improvement as to what’s expected and what’s delivered on 60FPS front. I really doubt 60FPS can be squeezed even from Pro given how it looks in trailers. I do hope that 40FPS performance modes become more common though, it’s way more achievable and still quite responsive.
          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #11
          With the amount of ray-traced reflections in the game, I doubt the ps5 with the previous gen amd gpu can even hit 40fps with a 1440 render resolution. It would probably have to drop to 1080 or less. It's definitely going to be game that will be best played on pc.
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
            I stopped trusting them when they flooded the conversation with Nvidia price hike apologia since the Ada line’s (rtx 2000) release. They seem to have gone easy on the evangelization most recently, but they will still absolutely not do the bare minimum of calling out how insane it is for a company to engage straight-up false advertising in their official performance metrics. I liked their “optimized settings” series, but that series ended (AFAIK)
            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #12
            Was this before or after they were bought? Cause I'll give em a 2nd chance if it was after.
            A 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • ? Guest
              Honestly, I mostly trust them. I did feel they went too easy on some corpos, especially nvidia with series 50, but also amd and iirc they barely said anything about the Intel gen13/14 issues. Their attitude towards lower-end hardware is also a bit annoying, especially alex's. However they do have great retro reviews for both tech and games, and john's fascination with older tech is infectious. And I love that they have a positive attitude towards linux gaming and privacy in general, unlike many other channels.
              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Guest
              wrote last edited by
              #13
              > I did feel they went too easy on some corpos, especially nvidia with series 50, but also amd and iirc they barely said anything about the Intel gen13/14 issues. As someone who’s been following them for ages now, my understanding is that they say what needs to be said and move on when it comes to things that are beyond their control - personal opinions are for their weekly podcast. They could criticise pricing and customer hostile behaviour more but they seem to be very cautious about not contributing to unproductive negativity that’s so prevalent in video game commentary. Ultimately it’s up to consumers to vote with their wallets because talking about things doesn’t fix them. Blaming journalists for not speaking against things enough is not going to fix them either.
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
                I stopped trusting them when they flooded the conversation with Nvidia price hike apologia since the Ada line’s (rtx 2000) release. They seem to have gone easy on the evangelization most recently, but they will still absolutely not do the bare minimum of calling out how insane it is for a company to engage straight-up false advertising in their official performance metrics. I liked their “optimized settings” series, but that series ended (AFAIK)
                die4ever@retrolemmy.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                die4ever@retrolemmy.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                die4ever@retrolemmy.com
                wrote last edited by
                #14
                >I liked their “optimized settings” series, but that series ended (AFAIK) It didn't really end, it's just part of their normal game analysis now
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? Guest
                  Was this before or after they were bought? Cause I'll give em a 2nd chance if it was after.
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15
                  about 6 years before they were bought
                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
                    I stopped trusting them when they flooded the conversation with Nvidia price hike apologia since the Ada line’s (rtx 2000) release. They seem to have gone easy on the evangelization most recently, but they will still absolutely not do the bare minimum of calling out how insane it is for a company to engage straight-up false advertising in their official performance metrics. I liked their “optimized settings” series, but that series ended (AFAIK)
                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16
                    Eh, enough if their content can exist fine without calling anyone out. I don't think it's what any of them really want to do, they prefer to focus on games. I feel like they mostly call out individual game performance. You are right in that their consistency in what they get upset about seems inconsistent. It does feel like it might depend on what company was nice to them recently. But I still think the heart of their content works even with that issue. Optimized settings was my favorite thing too.
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
                      about 6 years before they were bought
                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17
                      They were partially owned by Eurogamer since the beginning. Eurogamer was bought by IGN last year although DF ownership situation was slightly more complex than that. This is the first time DF is truly independent.
                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? Guest
                        They were partially owned by Eurogamer since the beginning. Eurogamer was bought by IGN last year although DF ownership situation was slightly more complex than that. This is the first time DF is truly independent.
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18
                        Yep. So being bought made no difference in their coverage
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups