Chebucto Regional Softball Club

No Man's Sky was one of the most hyped video games in history due to procedural generation. The fact that they botched it on release is not relevant.

Ngl I stopped reading your comments after you equated generative AI to slavery and revealed that you are a troll arguing in bad faith

It's literally just implementation and they're both statistical models, but

Literally everything you just said applies to procedural generation, except that it is demonic because that's just silly

> by your logic, slavery would be excusable. That's the argument you're making.  I'm sorry, we're talking about the implementation of generated content in video games. That only works ifn it's EQUIVALENT to slavery, it's not, so "my logic" does not apply to slavery... Dude.

Yes, of course I did, it would be gross of me to let that slide

Totally valid, mutually conceded. I'd bet we can agree that the current climate of games generally praises procedurally generated content, regardless of how we experienced its history.

SLAVERY??? Come on man. Outrageous.

Your previous comment proved my point, thanks

> both are used to produce more content with less effort. There's your equivalence. Bingo. > As if the reason people don't like generative AI is because it makes bad games. Nice, point proven. If it doesn't make games bad, then the complaints are simply invalid and bandwagoning, and developers cannot be faulted for using it. LOL

I'm not and it's always been consistently praised.

LOL care to educate me on why one is acceptable and the other is not, then? I'll wait. (reality: it's a minor implementation detail and has no relevance to the user)

And yet you couldn't describe one aspect of the differences

Super weird take, honestly. Procedurally generated content gets no hate, despite it being janky dogshit, too.